Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2007 5:21:10 GMT -5
So baiscly, we ARE on topic then.  |
|
|
|
Post by neophone on May 21, 2007 14:45:20 GMT -5
Paul,
I do believe so. I'll have to confirm it with our panel or experts........
Regards,
J.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2007 18:09:04 GMT -5
Oaky J. Thanks!  |
|
|
|
Post by neophone on May 22, 2007 0:56:41 GMT -5
Gentlemen,
According to a completely pointlessly random sampling of gamblers, shoplifters and homeless panhandlers we are indeed on topic. The results have been tabulated by the firm of Hamilton, Wenham & Ipswich Accountants At Large, with offices scattered aimlessly across the North Shore of Massachusetts.
BTW notice the new thread on the other board started by you know who. As usual he goes a bit to far and starts a "normal thread" to justify himself- I hope that thread goes off topic! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Regards,
J. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2007 17:16:31 GMT -5
I myself, prefer Dewey, Cheatem, and Howe.  |
|
|
|
Post by lukewarmwater on May 22, 2007 18:00:46 GMT -5
When my chips are down, I turn to the firm of Solitary, Poore, Brutish & Short.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2007 18:13:27 GMT -5
Ah! That's a good one, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Brown on May 22, 2007 19:07:39 GMT -5
He's an idiot, and is the main reason I stopped visiting the other board. I can't for the life of me figure out why Dan won't boot him for good, or at least reign him in.
Matt
|
|
|
|
Post by neophone on May 23, 2007 4:20:04 GMT -5
He's an idiot, and is the main reason I stopped visiting the other board. I can't for the life of me figure out why Dan won't boot him for good, or at least reign him in. Matt Matt, You're not the only one, many great minds have studied the problem without result. It is believed that if we could but answer that question we would be that much closer to World peace.........and a cure for cancer! ;D I think I shall be dead and buried by the time we find out what "The Proper Authorities" are going to do with all the information provided to them by the corrupt canine. ;D Regards, J. |
|
|
|
Post by gramophoneshane on May 23, 2007 5:51:06 GMT -5
LOL! Corrupt Canine- I like that!!..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2007 19:34:26 GMT -5
Hey! This is the longest thread I have ever had. Read 222 times. With now 40 replies! |
|
|
|
Post by neophone on May 25, 2007 0:14:45 GMT -5
Hey! This is the longest thread I have ever had. Read 222 times. With now 40 replies! AHEM, Paul that last post wasn't strickly "ON TOPIC" as we say. Now Behave! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Regards, J. |
|
|
|
Post by neophone on May 25, 2007 0:23:01 GMT -5
Gents, Now to be completely serious (That's why I made this separate post.) There is currently a very interesting thread over there right now: Edison tonal "range" burn out.. which I would like to enter, however I know the Hell Hound (and I don't mean Baskerville! ;D) would jump right in with nasty comments regarding what I would have to say. I'm actually very surprised he hasn't totally misdirected that thread already. That's another reason I hesitate to contribute, I would hate to be even indirectly responsible for a good thread going down the tubes. Regards, J. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt Brown on May 25, 2007 0:58:35 GMT -5
John,
By all means, start a similar thread here - sounds interesting from the title.
I'll keep the dogs at bay on this board ;D
Matt
|
|
|
|
Post by gramophoneshane on May 25, 2007 1:38:09 GMT -5
John- maybe he's decided to pull his head in a bit after I told him he contributes nothing to the board except childish comments and bad titty jokes?? One can only hope.
|
|
