|
Post by tarheeltinkerer on Dec 18, 2009 14:46:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by larryh on Dec 18, 2009 22:50:54 GMT -5
Nice looking machine. Too bad they used those darn pot metal parts in that era. I have sort of been looking for something along those lines as well since I sold the credenza this summer. In hind site I probably should have replaced the brass reproducer since it was probably worth what the whole machine brought.
Larry
|
|
|
Post by tarheeltinkerer on Dec 23, 2009 11:22:04 GMT -5
The tone arm support is currently being repaired and cleaned by George Vollema. As for the soundbox, I'm going to play the phonograph with it as is and if it sounds fine, it will be left alone until my phonograph coffers are refilled, haha. I am going to be selling this Edison Standard D player of mine and hope to get $200 or so from it. With it's sale, I will probably take the funds and use them to have this soundbox rebuilt, or just buy a nice brass reproduction soundbox.
|
|
|
Post by tarheeltinkerer on Jan 7, 2010 19:49:51 GMT -5
She is now up and running:
|
|
|
Post by Edison Restorer 64 on Jan 9, 2010 8:10:24 GMT -5
Nice Song N the Phono Sounds great as Per the Edison d PLease email me on it ok rock50scollector@verizon.net many Thanks from william S
|
|
|
Post by tarheeltinkerer on Jan 9, 2010 10:27:51 GMT -5
Nice Song N the Phono Sounds great as Per the Edison d PLease email me on it ok rock50scollector@verizon.net many Thanks from william S Personally, I think this blows the Edisons sound-wise out of the water. Granted, with an Edisonic reproducer and an electrically recorded DD, I don't know how it will stack up. Here's a worn record playing on the victrola:
|
|